Vermont Law and Graduate School Files Motion For Preliminary Injunction In Federal Court To Stop BLM
NEWS PROVIDED BY Wild Horse Ranch Productions
CA wild horse and burro advocacy org. Wild Horse Fire Brigade alleges illegal roundup by Bureau of Land Management in Oregon, temporarily halting roundup
YREKA, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, October 17, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ -- A team of legal scholars at the Vermont Law and Graduate School, led by Professor-Litigator Michael Harris, have filed a Motion For Preliminary Injunction against the Bureau of Land Management ('BLM') in the federal court of Washington, D.C. on Friday, October 14, 2022.
Vermont Law and Graduate School client Wild Horse Fire Brigade ('WHFB'), believes that the BLM's actions are illegal
"We don't like seeing tax-dollars used to defend the Bureau of Land Management against lawsuits that have little or no chance of success. However, we believe this case has a compelling fact-set", said Deb Ferns, President of Wild Horse Fire Brigade, an all-volunteer California-based 501-c-3 nonprofit wild horse and burro advocacy organization.
As a part of the entire 26-page legal filing and 300-pages of supporting documents, the Motion contains and alleges the following:
"As an initial matter, counsel for WHFB has had ongoing discussions since October 4, 2022, with the U.S. Department of Justice regarding WHFB’s intent to file this motion. Specifically, the parties have discussed whether the timing of the action being challenged could be changed to allow for a hearing on a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. BLM has agreed to “pause” the round-up and removal of wild horses from the HMA until at least October 24, 2022. BLM has also agreed to file a response to this Motion on or before October 21, 2022.
Plaintiff Wild Horse Fire Brigade (WHFB) seeks a preliminary injunction against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to stop the ongoing capture and removal of wild horses from private property within and adjacent to the Pokegama Herd.
Management Area (HMA), located near Klamath Falls, Oregon.
Through this roundup, BLM intends to permanently remove over 200 wild horses from an estimated population of 230 in the HMA.
BLM initiated this roundup after receiving at least one complaint on April 24, 2020, from a private landowner, the Green Diamond Resource Company (GDRC), which owns a significant amount of land within and around the HMA.
In responding to the GDRC complaint, BLM announced on August 20, 2022, in a press release that it would both respond to the complaint by removing horses from the private property and permanently remove them from the HMA by sending the trapped horses to a BLM holding facility in Burns, Oregon.
It is the decision to permanently remove the horses in violation of the Free Roaming Wild Horse and Burro Act (WHBA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., and applicable BLM regulations and guidance, that is being challenged here.
In making this decision to permanently remove the horses, BLM failed to:
(1) conduct and make the legally required excess determination; and,
(2) conduct a review of the decision under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and,
(3) provide the public reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment, as required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), BLM guidance applicable to decisions to remove wild horses from the range, and/or NEPA.
BLM and the courts have repeatedly concluded that the agency is required to conduct an excess determination, to provide the public with draft environmental documentation for review, and to provide the public with thirty days to comment on the proposal before issuing a final decision on a wild horse roundup. In addition, BLM must issue a proper Final Decision thirty-one to seventy-six days before the proposed roundup.
Here, BLM did none of these things. Instead, after receiving a complaint from a local landowner that horses had strayed from the HMA onto private property, BLM chose to bypass the required process and initiate a permanent removal of the horses.
While BLM is authorized to remove wild horses under its jurisdiction from private property, they must be returned to the HMA. That authority does not provide BLM an alternative to the required process for deciding to permanently remove wild horses as excess from an HMA.
This is made clear by BLM’s own regulations, which distinguish between responding to a complaint of a landowner to remove “nuisance” horses, and the decision by the agency to remove “excess” horses from private land in and around a herd management area. See 43 C.F.R. §§ 4720.1-.2."
“The BLM has a history of cutting corners and ignoring their legal obligations in a rush to get rid of wild horses in the west,” Professor Michael Harris, director of the Environmental Advocacy Clinic at Vermont Law and Graduate School said. “Horses are native to the west and are an important aspect of the ecosystem. We need to work to increase their numbers to ensure healthy, stable herds.”